March 21, 2023
Intern vacancy based in Dublin office
Due to continued growth, we’re looking to recruit another intern to join our highly regarded team based in Dublin 2. Interns at Lavelle Partners get the opportunity to work across...
The lack of a statutory framework for whistleblower protection has been repeatedly cited, both at home and abroad, as a significant gap in Ireland’s anti-corruption laws. Previous governments have developed the legislation surrounding whistleblower protection by a piecemeal, sector-by-sector basis. However, with the publication of the Protected Disclosures Bill 2013, the Government is now introducing a comprehensive, pan-sectoral legislative framework for the protection of whistleblowers – fulfilling its commitment to such protections in the Programme for Government and in the recommendations of the Final Report of the Mahon Tribunal.
The area of whistleblower protection has been developing in Irish law for a number of years. Various provisions were included in legislation governing specific sectors of the economy outlining narrow whistleblower protections, often coupled with mandatory reporting rules. The recent enactment of the Central Bank (Supervision and Enforcement) Act 2013 represents the most recent of these ad-hoc developments in our whistleblower protection laws.
In addition to the domestic development of the law in this area, Ireland is also following the lead of the UK in whistleblower protection. The Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 was introduced in the aftermath of a number of financial scandals. The need for amendments to the initial legislation have provided a number of useful lessons for the Irish legislature, particularly in the amendment requiring for the disclosure to be in the public interest in order for the worker to be eligible for the protection of the legislation.
The Bill contains a number of features informed by the experience of the UK government in legislating in this area, as well as by previous ad hoc domestic developments. A number of these provisions have a particular impact on the employment relationship and add a number of obligations on the employer in this jurisdiction. These include that:
The Unfair Dismissals Act 1977 is also to be amended by the Bill. These amendments include:
The identity of the whistleblower is protected under the Bill. Furthermore, the person to whom the protected disclosure was made must take all reasonable steps to ensure any information that may reveal the identity of the whistleblower is not disclosed. However, circumstances where the identity of the whistleblower may be disclosed do exist, including where the whistleblower agrees to the disclosure of their identity, as well as other defined circumstances.
Other relevant provisions the Bill include compelling public bodies to establish procedures for handling protected disclosures, the prohibition upon clauses that preclude the application of the Bill or provide for an action for breach of contract regarding the making of a protected disclosure, as well as amendments to other pieces of primary and secondary legislation. Furthermore, the Bill has no effect on existing immunities, privileges or defences.
There are a number of practical implications to the publishing of this Bill, many of which have been previously seen in the UK, where employers developed internal procedures for handling such disclosures to ensure the apparent problems were fixed before they became public. IBEC has expressed concern that this will place an administrative and legal burden on employers. There are still some practical concerns for would-be whistleblowers. For instance, making an “unprotected disclosure” may expose the worker to potential disciplinary action.
Nonetheless, if this Bill is enacted it will provide a much-needed uniformity across sectors to the whistleblower protection laws in this jurisdiction and will do much to restore Ireland’s integrity and international esteem in combating corruption.
Contact our office
Make an enquiry